Aller au contenu

Mode données d'exemple. Les entreprises, offres et demandes d'exemple affichées sont fictives (images IA) et ne sont pas comptées dans les chiffres ci-dessous.

Resistance to xylophagous organisms in Eucalyptus clone wood intended for sawn products

Luciana Ferreira da Silva, Juarez Benigno Paes, Flávia Maria Silva Brito, Glaucileide Ferreira, Djeison César Batista, Yonny Martínez López, Walter Torezani Neto Boschetti

15 avril 2025 · Wood Material Science and Engineering

This publication is not marked as Open Access. The full text may require access through the publisher.

Summary

No reviewed summary yet. Read the abstract below or open the original publication.

Abstract

Environmental concerns have promoted the use of reforestation woods to meet industrial demands. However, these woods have less biological resistance than tropical forest species. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of density, holocellulose, lignin, extractives and wood ash from Eucalyptus hybrids intended for producing sawn timber, on the biological resistance to fungi and xylophagous termites under laboratory conditions. Five Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla clones, with different proportions of parents and one Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus camaldulensis clone, were tested against fungi and xylophagous termites. Brown rot (Gloeophyllum trabeum, Rhodonia placenta and Neolentinus lepdeus) and white rot fungi (Trametes versicolor) were tested, as well as Nasutitermes corniger (no-choice feeding and choice feeding tests), and drywood Cryptotermes brevis. Biological resistance to fungi was influenced by density, extractives and ash. The wood was classified as moderately resistant, resistant and highly resistant to fungi. The wood had moderate attack and close-to-intense damage in the no-choice feeding test with termites. However, the wood had low resistance in the choice feeding test. The clones were moderately attacked in relation to drywood termites, with low mass loss and high mortality. Clones C and F were the most resistant to the xylophagous tested.

Abstract as supplied by the source. Full text may be restricted by the publisher.

Related publications